Skip to header Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer

OpenAI Raises 11 Billion Dollars at a 1.25 Trillion Dollar Valuation, and the Market Is Blinking

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • OpenAI Raises 11 Billion Dollars at a 1.25 Trillion Dollar Valuation, and the Market Is Blinking
Photograph of OpenAI CEO Sam Altman seated on stage during a TED talk.

OpenAI has reportedly raised 11 billion dollars so far in a new funding round that values the company at 1.25 trillion dollars, Bloomberg reported on Friday, in a story carried by TechCrunch on November 6. The round has not closed yet. It is expected to close in the coming weeks and could total about 20 billion dollars, according to a source familiar with the matter. TechCrunch said it had reached out to OpenAI for comment. Even at a trillion-dollar-plus valuation, the striking part of the report is not the size of the number. It is the direction it moved.

In late September, Bloomberg reported that OpenAI was looking to raise 30 billion dollars in this round. The current figures fall well short of that target, and separate reporting on Friday said OpenAI had lowered its proposed valuation to 1.25 trillion dollars from 1.4 trillion dollars and cut its fundraising goals by about 10 billion dollars. Its chief rival is seeing the same repricing. Bloomberg also reported on Friday that potential buyers of shares in Anthropic's upcoming public offering are eyeing a substantially lower valuation than the company had targeted, with some buyers seeing it as low as 1.1 trillion dollars, compared with the 2 trillion dollars investors were said to expect roughly a month ago.

New spending data helps explain the blink. A report from Ramp, also covered by TechCrunch on November 6, found that business spending on AI tokens grew only 1.5 percent across August and September, after growing 42 percent in July, even as token volumes kept rising. Ramp's lead economist, Ara Kharazian, pointed to price competition rather than weak demand. OpenAI halved API prices for GPT-6 Sol and GPT-6 Luna in September, and Anthropic has cut prices for Fable 5.1 and Opus 5.5, a move the company said in a recent filing reduced revenue growth by about 600 million dollars. Median firms spend only 12 to 15 dollars per employee per month on AI, Ramp found, while the top 10 percent spend 600 to 1,000 dollars. Spending did re-accelerate in October, rising 8.9 percent from September 23 to October 23, but the hypergrowth assumption is clearly under pressure.

The politics have shifted at the same time. TechCrunch noted that the Democratic landslide in this week's United States midterm elections, and strongly negative voter sentiment around data centers, has caused jitters across the market, with further regulatory challenges expected. OpenAI had previously suggested it would go public this year, then delayed those plans, and an initial public offering is now expected at some point next year. None of this amounts to a collapse. A company raising 11 billion dollars at a 1.25 trillion dollar valuation is still operating at a scale no software business has reached before. What has changed is that investors are now asking what the revenue underneath that valuation actually does next.

For people building with AI, this is mostly good news, and it should be used. A buyer's market means the price war is real, routing work to cheaper models pays, and no business case should be built on today's list price or on the assumption that a single provider's growth curve justifies lock-in. The labs still need enormous amounts of capital for compute, and they will keep competing for developers while they raise it. The practical move is the unglamorous one: measure cost per completed task, keep a second provider integrated, and let the trillion-dollar argument happen between the labs and their investors.

Rocky Mountain Madman LLC
OpenAI
AI Funding
Frontier Models
Enterprise AI
AI Pricing

Ai Industry News

Nvidia's Flora Labels Robot Video for 72 Cents an Hour, Not 88 Dollars

Photograph of two humanoid robots, one working alongside a woman in a kitchen and another wearing a white Nvidia hard hat at a work station

Nvidia's GEAR robotics lab has open-sourced Flora, the data engine it uses to train its GR00T humanoid robot models, and the headline number is hard to ignore. Reporting by The Decoder on October 25, drawing on Nvidia's research paper, puts Flora's cost at about 72 cents to label one hour of robot video, compared with roughly 88.49 dollars for OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra. The models are available on Hugging Face, and Nvidia says the system already annotates up to 200,000 hours of video a day across 512 GB300 GPUs in its own training pipeline.

  • Read more about Nvidia's Flora Labels Robot Video for 72 Cents an Hour, Not 88 Dollars

Apollo Says AI Has Paid Off Nowhere Outside Tech: The S&P 493 Are Still Flat

Photograph of the carved stone facade of the New York Stock Exchange building with its gold Stock Exchange lettering.

Apollo Global Management's chief economist has put a number on the suspicion many finance chiefs have been voicing privately. In a note published October 24, Torsten Slok argued that artificial intelligence has delivered, in his words, zero financial payoff to corporate America outside of tech. TechCrunch reported the note on October 25. His test is deliberately plain: strip the Magnificent Seven out of the S&P 500, and the remaining 493 companies show flat profit margins, flat revenue per worker, and no sign in the productivity data that AI is moving the needle yet.

  • Read more about Apollo Says AI Has Paid Off Nowhere Outside Tech: The S&P 493 Are Still Flat

Anthropic Says One Agent Beats Many: Fold Your Subagents Back Into the Loop

Photograph of Dario Amodei.

Anthropic is telling enterprise builders to do the unfashionable thing: use fewer agents. In guidance published October 22 from its Applied AI team, and reported widely on October 25, the company said that across several enterprise deployments a single agent that loads skills and tools only when needed frequently beat both a one-prompt-for-everything design and a fleet of specialised subagents on quality, and often cost less and ran faster. In one comparison the single-agent setup ran about twice as fast as the multi-agent version it replaced.

  • Read more about Anthropic Says One Agent Beats Many: Fold Your Subagents Back Into the Loop

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Page 11
  • Page 12
  • Current page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

Copyright © 2026 Rocky Mountain Madman LLC - All rights reserved

Developed and Designed by Rocky Mountain Madman LLC