Skip to header Skip to main navigation Skip to main content Skip to footer

Anthropic's FlashProve Could Prove Which Model Answered You

Breadcrumb

  • Home
  • Anthropic's FlashProve Could Prove Which Model Answered You
Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei speaking on stage at a TechCrunch event.

Anthropic published FlashProve on November 3, an open-source prototype for what its researchers call provable inference. The idea is simple to state and hard to do: when a model answers you, it should also produce a cryptographic proof that the answer really came from the specific model you were told you were using. TechCrunch reported the release the same day, and Anthropic released a technical report, a protocol specification, executable code and formal proofs under the Apache 2.0 license.

FlashProve works in two steps. A provider first publishes a commitment, a short fingerprint of one exact set of model weights, while the weights themselves stay private. Each response then carries a proof, built with a type of cryptographic proof known as a zkSNARK, that those committed weights produced those exact words. Anthropic tested the system on Meta's Llama 4 Maverick, a 400-billion-parameter mixture-of-experts model in 4-bit form. A single H100 GPU generated proofs at about 110 tokens per second, with a proof of about 19 megabytes for a 1,024-token request. Verification takes seconds, but proving takes about 70 to 95 times the GPU time of running the model itself.

That cost is why this matters as a direction rather than as a product. Anthropic says plainly that the research is intermediate progress, that there are no plans to deploy FlashProve at Anthropic or any other lab, and that others should take the work and improve it. The current prototype also covers only mixture-of-experts models, short contexts and a whole-number version of a model under greedy decoding. A user must still trust that a published commitment belongs to the model a lab says it does. None of that makes the underlying problem go away.

The problem is getting more commercial by the month. A routing service can quietly substitute a cheaper model, an attacker can tamper with a token stream, an evaluator can be shown a stronger model than customers receive, and a regulator can be told an approved model is running when it is not. Menlo Ventures, in its State of Enterprise AI report also released on November 3, estimated that enterprise AI deployment spending reached 176.8 billion dollars by September, up 5.4 times from 33 billion dollars a year earlier, and that agents now generate 80 percent of tokens on OpenRouter. When machines, not people, are most of the customers, a receipt for which model did the work stops being an academic curiosity.

For builders, the practical lesson is to start asking for receipts now, even before proofs this strong are affordable. Log the exact model identifier, provider and routing path for every consequential agent run, keep those logs where a client or auditor can inspect them, and treat any silent model substitution as a breach of contract rather than a routine upgrade. FlashProve will not run in production tomorrow at 70 to 95 times the cost of inference. But it shows that model identity can, in principle, be proved without revealing the weights, and that is the standard the largest buyers will eventually demand.

Anthropic
AI Safety
Enterprise AI
Large Language Models
Mixture of Experts
Rocky Mountain Madman LLC

Ai Industry News

Axios: OpenAI and Anthropic Execs War-Game the Day After a Catastrophic AI Event

Cartoon illustration of robot executives around a war-room table rehearsing a crisis plan while a city power-grid panel flashes alerts.

The industry's own insiders say a catastrophic AI incident is coming within six to twelve months. The industry's executives are rehearsing what to say the day after.

  • Read more about Axios: OpenAI and Anthropic Execs War-Game the Day After a Catastrophic AI Event

Google's Gemini Agent: One Universal Workplace Agent, Now in Private Preview

Cartoon illustration of a friendly robot concierge juggling envelopes, documents, spreadsheets, and chat bubbles while directing tiny robot assistants.

Google just made its boldest move in the race to sell AI that does work, not chat: a single universal agent for the workplace, announced at its Gemini at Work 2026 event on October 8.

  • Read more about Google's Gemini Agent: One Universal Workplace Agent, Now in Private Preview

Anthropic and OpenAI Declare Unauthorized Share Transfers Void; Tokenized Shares Crash

Cartoon illustration of a giant rubber stamp slamming down onto paper stock certificates while a stock chart plunges behind.

If you bought a slice of Anthropic or OpenAI on the secondary market, you might want to sit down. The labs just told the market, in unison, that your shares may not exist.

Anthropic and OpenAI both updated their stock-transfer policies this week to declare any share transfer made without board approval "void" — not voidable, void. A void transfer never legally happened. The buyer is not recognized as a shareholder and has no rights. OpenAI's language was nearly identical: transfers without written consent "will not be recognized and carry no economic value to you."

  • Read more about Anthropic and OpenAI Declare Unauthorized Share Transfers Void; Tokenized Shares Crash

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • …
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Current page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • …
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

Copyright © 2026 Rocky Mountain Madman LLC - All rights reserved

Developed and Designed by Rocky Mountain Madman LLC